Web Gallery: Brian Felsen

 
 

SMARTS Gallery helps talented international artists and designers advance their creative careers. Aside from presenting their artwork, we help them understand their work in the context of the art market, and to develop effective presentation skills and documents. Click here for more information.

 

 

 

 

 
     

Interview with Brian Felsen
Conducted by Lauran Bonilla*

Brian Felsen's work is characterized by his pursuit of a conceptual desire to explore elusive and recurring patterns in time. Brian is very articulate and comprehensive in describing his work. The following is an edited version of an interview conducted between him and Smarts Gallery Writer Lauran Bonilla on October 14, 2005, as he prepared to display his work in the Cognitive Being show.

Lauren Bonilla: How did you begin your career as an artist?

Brian Felsen: I became interested in the fact that my scientist heroes liked and admired the formality of Bach’s Canon in fugue; their theories could be musically represented by varying the way polyphony played out. By altering Canon in fugue I could develop and illustrate some of their theories, parallel processing, multiple drafts, cerebral celebrity, and other topics of philosophy that interest me.

LB: How did you go from getting your business degree to being an artist?

BF: I had a business that produced Rock’n’Roll music festivals. My wife gave me the courage to sell my business, and I enrolled in Manus College. I taught myself classical composition because I had to create a new form to illustrate these ideas. I wrote an Oratorio based on texts by my favorite writers and their ideas. This way I was able to get into a dialogue about their pieces which led me to grants and opportunities and other collaborative works with academic scientists and philosophers all over world.

LB: How did this lead you to create photographs like the ones for Cognitive Being?

BF: I became interested in how these ideas could be represented in different media. Each medium presents different challenges. There were certain things that needed to be visually done that couldn’t be done with music alone. When there were different things that I couldn’t represent, I turned to different medium: playwriting, short films, photography and stereography. With poetry, for example, I have taken postmodernist tropes and instead of using them to comment on the text or centrality versus margins of meaning, I use them to represent how the mind works and metacognition. What is it is like to introspect? I created an idiolect and a form of short hand, of symbolic notation, that captures the stream of consciousness which is less linear, slow and intrusive than common everyday English language. It can look like a cat walked on my keyboard.

LB: Why are you doing this?

BF: So that I can recognize recurring patterns in my thought and behavior. I peel back a layer of introspection that would not ordinarily be possible, and it is also a tool by which others can do the same. Lastly, it is interesting looking and artwork. It also serves as a generating device to create other artistic projects. This theoretical writing feeds back artistic productions, but it also works in reverse. One downside of art is that aesthetics is an implacable task master. If ever I have an idea to express, what looks or sounds pretty generally always trumps. For example, if I need to vary a fugue, so that the flute will represent a certain thought I would have it play a certain line, but that line might end up being unhearable because it is too low in the flute’s register, or sounds bad or out of tune. In that case, all theory goes out of window, because I have to do what sounds good. But it opens new ideas for thought and patterns that I didn’t know existed.

LB: That makes sense.

BF: Another down side is that the learning curve is huge when entering any dialogue with a new medium. For this reason I don’t think I will ever paint. I am beginning to collaborate more with artists. In this sense I am more a conceptual artist than a master craftsman. I had to spend a year learning filmmaking, or composition, or Photoshop and photographic lighting. It is always a delightful hassle, but I am beginning to depend on the craftsmanship of others to be able to enter new media.

LB: Do you ever feel you are aiming too far?

BF: I create what I have to create. I don’t have choice in the matter. I believe I have volition about what the artistic output is, but my aesthetic sensibilities are what they are, and I make what is good and necessary at the time. That is the reason I have a day job, it reinforces the idea in my head that my goal with my art is not to make money. I make what I have to make, it is a neurotic compulsion. And it is economically harmful, and takes time and sleep away.

LB: Ultimately, what are you trying to do with your art?

BF: I try to capture elusive emotions, or I will try to capture an idea over a tenth of a second. Or I’ll try and freeze or capture things on film that don’t exist, half suppressed ideas, or psychosexual longings. I try to use photo manipulation to show things that can’t be seen. Art is applied theory for me, these artworks are like little models of the theory I like. My dream was to talk to my cognitive science heroes, and I did. If I can make people laugh also, that’s great.

 

*Lauran Bonilla is currently in the Ph.D. Program for Art History at The Graduate Center of City University of New York. She received her B.A from Barnard College of Columbia University in Art History and Visual Arts. She has worked at several museums and art institutions, including the Museum of Modern Art (New York), the Museum of Costa Rican Art (Costa Rica), the Museum of Contemporary Art & Design (Costa Rica), Christie's (New York), and The Drawing Center (New York).